Showing posts with label Pennsylvania. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Pennsylvania. Show all posts

Tuesday, November 7, 2017

Justice For... Just Some? (Happy Election Day 2017)

  




 Justice for... just some? Why not all? This week we're looking at how the 99% is being treated by the corrupt system that cares little for our economic or physical/mental health. Bern Notice debunks that popular myth of the Reagan era. "The Rational National" tells us how difficult the battle for universal health care was in Canada and how it could come about in the U.S. 


But first, it's Election Day and if you haven't already voted early, please get to the polls as soon as you can. Yeah, 2016 looked like this meme, but that's no reason for you not to turn out and vote in this "off year" for important issues on your state ballot and to decide local elections. Remember to vote your conscience. You're not stuck with just establishment candidates--vote third party or write in a name of a candidate you feel is worthy. We can't live in fear of the status quo forever. Let's take our democracy back!

by Bern Notice
Trickle-down economics. Reagan’s legacy, and the economic model espoused by the Republican Party. It is defined as:
A theory that financial benefits given to big business will in turn pass down to smaller businesses and consumers.
How much of the trickle have you felt from the enhanced prosperity of big business owners? For the vast majority of Americans, it has been very little. To demonstrate why, It is important to define another term so that we understand the point in its entirety.
Profit Margin:  The difference between the cost of buying or making something and the price at which it is sold.
The argument that money will trickle down fails in a case like McDonald’s. McDonald’s has had pretty good profit margins over the past 5+ years. At its lowest margin during that period, it was 36.94%. Currently, McDonalds profit margin is at its peak, at 48.96%. As of March, 2016 the profit margin was at 39.19%. Meaning, that at their lowest point, McDonald’s made 36.94% more capital than they spent.
The CEO of McDonalds, Steve Easterbrook brought in an income of $15.4 million last year, according to The Chicago Tribune. To be fair, please note his base salary is $1.3 million. Some of the rest was made from stock options. However, he received a performance bonus of $4.6 million
Income inequality
While the top 1% has flourished since the 1980’s under trickle down economics, the rest of the country has been stagnant. How will additional tax breaks to the top 1% help the rest of America prosper?
Now let’s look at the workers. According to Glassdoor, the average wage for a McDonald’s cashier is $8.60 per hour. A shift manager averages $10.41 per hour. Bear in mind that from their salaries, they have to pay for medical and other benefits if they need them, which further reduces take home salary. If you’re a sole bread-winner with a family, would you be able to afford benefits and save for retirement with those salaries?
I’m reasonably sure that some people may say “Those jobs aren’t meant for people supporting a family.” That may be true for years past, but after the recession and so many high paying jobs being sent overseas for cheaper labor, the pool of eligible workers has expanded. These same individuals are looking to put food on their table via an honest living. As a result, now you see increasing numbers of older adults working in these positions to try to stay afloat.
All the while McDonald is making their annual average 36 – 38% profits while keeping pay rates relatively stagnant. And again, if the argument is that the costs increased for doing business, remember we’re talking profit margins, not profits. So they still made 35% more than they spent. So while their spending on everything else has increased with the cost of inflation, their spending on their employees’ salary has not.
Meanwhile McDonalds and similar businesses get tax breaks for stock options given to executives as compensation, and then list them as an expense when filing taxes. Yet they do this while paying their employees as little as possible.
Now let’s look at the after effects. The cost of everything from gasoline to food and utilities has gone up and your salary hasn’t. You no longer have disposable income for luxuries. You are spending what you have on necessities. You may pass on going out to eat or getting a gadget that you need to make your life easier.
As spending decreases, profits for corporations and shareholders decrease. As a result, the corporation will lay off workers, thus adding to the pool of individuals who are unable to buy your product. Then the cycle starts all over again. It’s basic supply and demand. All the while, the CEO of that company will get a fat bonus for “increasing efficiency.”
Micky D's Replacement
If this cycle is allowed to continue, the only people who will have money will be the super wealthy business owner. Then you will have serfdom and feudalism. It’s obvious when you think the cycle through. The only way you don’t see it is if you completely ignore the facts.
At the end of the day, this model is inherently flawed because of one simple factor… human greed. If you offer someone a million dollars, and it is not stipulated that they have to share it with other people, most people would keep it and spend it on themselves. It’s just human nature.
With that being said, it may make more sense to offer tax breaks to people who make 100K or less, and new start up businesses than it does to grant further tax breaks for large well established businesses and multi-millionaires. Those who work paycheck to paycheck are the consumer. They are more likely to spend most of what they make than those who have tons of money.
Small start-up & Mom and Pop businesses are similar. The small businesses as they grow are also more likely to hire more people, thus adding more consumers to the market. As they grow they will invest in their infrastructure to expand and become the new big business, and offer consumers more options through genuine competition.
Make no mistake; I have no problem with businesses, shareholders and corporations making profits. CEO’s have to bear a lot of responsibility, and are likely the first to go when a business goes south. So they should be able to make more than the people they are responsible for employing. Shareholders should also be able to reap profits from smart investment strategies.
With that being said, economics can’t just serve the supply side. There must also be a demand. Most of the demand comes from the consumers who are the employees who work on the ground level of business. Until working class citizens’ salaries are able to keep up with the cost of inflation, they will not have disposable income. There is will be little to no demand. Then there will be practically no chance for upward mobility. Trickle-down economics has failed the working class citizen, and it’s time for people take their heads out of the sand and recognize that.

BIO: Bern Notice is making a difference by speaking out on issues that affect the 99%. Support him and his Seeing Through the B.S. blog and leave a comment thanking him for his invaluable service.




***
A must-watch video for all Americans, a Canadian gives us a history lesson into how difficult it was to fight for and establish universal health care in his country. We can learn a lot from our friends north of the border.

 


 ***
And now some more examples of how justice for the rich is at the expense of ordinary Americans. Support these causes with your time and resources. We're all in this together!
 From the Green Party of Pennsylvania:

It's been over six months since the special election in Philadelphia that saw widespread voter intimidation and election fraud. The people of the 197th have been waiting for any sign that justice will be served and their votes will be counted.

Today, the Pennsylvania Attorney General finally began filing charges. Four election workers at the Esperanza Health Center polling place were charged with election fraud.

Please donate  to our continued efforts to bring have a new election for the people of Philadelphia's 197th district.

And this is just the beginning. Reports of fraud happened not just at Esperanza but at over 20 other polling locations--and the scheme goes must deeper than the workers at the polling places. We look forward to further developments with Attorney General Shapiro's investigation.

We are also waiting to hear back about our federal court case regarding these election fraud charges. Democrats and Pennsylvania election officials brought forth a motion to dismiss in September. At the hearing our lawyers asked point blank--who is responsible for this election?

At best, this was a systemic failure of our election system and someone has to be constitutionally or legally responsible. At worst, this was an intentional scheme for widespread election fraud and those who organized it behinds the scenes must be held accountable for their criminal acts.

I need help to continue to pay my lawyers fees and office rent. I am continuing to fight for the people of the 197th district through all the delay tactics, the smoke and mirrors, that the corrupt officials are trying to pull. But my team and I need your help.

Click here to chip in $27 or whatever you can afford so that we can continue to pursue our court case and organize in our neighborhood.

If the court case precedes, there is precedent that Philadelphians could get a new, fairly-conducted election. That is what we and our lawyer are demanding and that's my team and I are organizing for in our neighborhood. If there's a new election, we will win because it will not be stolen again.

contribute.jpg

Thank you for your continued support.

Solidarity,

Cheri Honkala
Candidate for State Representative
Former Green Party VP Candidate
@cherihonkala


P.S. Recently the Green Party gained it's first State Representative in Maine! If we win a new election in Pennsylvania's 197th, I hope to be the second! Please donate $27 or any amount you can today to help build this Green momentum through 2018.

***

Image
Stand up to defend the right to peaceful protest.
Take Action
CALL 213-335-2077 NOW and tell your member of Congress that standing up for the right to clean water is peaceful protest, not terrorism.






Last year, thousands of people around the world raised their voices to protest the construction of the Dakota Access Pipeline. They stood in solidarity with Indigenous leaders and Water Protectors, who were fighting for clean water — and their right to make decisions about what happens on their land. The movement has spread, and local communities everywhere, inspired by Standing Rock, are building a groundswell of change across the U.S. and Canada to stop pipelines from being built.

Now 84 members of Congress — including your representative — have signed a letter suggesting that the brave people standing up to the big oil companies could be considered “terrorists.”1 They’re trying to criminalize free speech with a term intended to scare — and we need you to help speak out against them.

Call your representative now at 213-335-2077 to let them know you believe that peaceful protest is essential, and ask them to rescind their support of this fear-mongering letter. We have to show the oil and gas industry that strategies like this, which they hope will silence us, will backfire instead. When we work together, we’re stronger.

It’s no surprise that so many members of Congress would prefer to treat people fighting for their homes and the planet like criminals.2 Big Oil has spent hundreds of millions of dollars to guarantee Congressional support on its endless quest to turn a profit at any cost. The powerful movement inspired by Standing Rock scares them, and labeling the people around the country fighting for change as “terrorists” is easier than standing up to their corporate donors.


That’s why we need your help. We have to tell Congress that it’s unacceptable to put the greed of Big Oil above our basic rights: to protect our communities and precious water resources and to speak out against those that threaten them. Please call your members of Congress today at 213-335-2077 to let them know that corporate polluters don’t run our country.


Thank you for standing with us,

Diana Best
Senior Climate and Energy Campaigner, Greenpeace USA

[1] https://buck.house.gov/sites/buck.house.gov/files/wysiwyg_uploaded/Protecting%20Energy%20Infrastructure.pdf.
[2] https://thinkprogress.org/criminalize-pipeline-resistance-sessions-40828c2cb1e6/


***
The details are out―and (surprise) the Republican tax plan is not tax “reform.” It’s a massive tax cut mostly for the richest 1% and wealthy corporations. It will result in deep cuts to healthcare, education and other critical services we all rely on.
Paul Ryan and his fellow Republicans are trying to ram this sucker through the House before Thanksgiving. They figure if they move fast, and keep the American people in the dark, they can get it done. 

This is an absolutely critical time to take action to help us succeed in stopping this monstrosity. Phone calls are the single most important action you can take to stop it. There is no time to waste. If we block the bill in the House―which we can do with your help―our opponents are in deep trouble.
Call your U.S. Representative right now and tell them to OPPOSE the Republican tax plan:




877-795-7862
Here’s a suggested call script:

My name is _______. I live in TOWN, STATE and I’m a constituent of the Representative’s.
I want Representative [NAME] to OPPOSE the House tax plan that delivers huge tax cuts to the richest 1% and wealthy corporations, funded by slashing Medicare, Medicaid and education. It’s wrong to give special tax breaks to the wealthy and powerful at the expense of working families.
Not only does this tax plan cut the corporate tax rate from 35% to 20%―padding the pockets of CEO’s and shareholders―it’s also a job killer. By slashing the tax rate on foreign profits, the plan will encourage corporations to outsource jobs and shift profits offshore. 

Call your representative today to demand a tax system and an economy that works for everyone, not just the wealthy few. 

Thank you,
Craig Johnson
Digital Director
Americans for Tax Fairness Action Fund

Tuesday, October 24, 2017

Our Minds Matter--Our Lives Matter--Our Votes Matter

 Think For Yourself!
by C.A. Matthews

It's time to start thinking for ourselves, America!  It's time to stop taking the establishment at its word and trusting things will "turn out for the best" if we  keep our heads down and try hard not to be noticed. Deep down you know it doesn't work that way.

Our guest blogger this week shows us what can happen when we allow a self-centered oligarch like the Tangerine Tyrant Trump take a position of power and play with our health care under the ACA. Our health, our very lives will be compromised; our freedom of choice and the control over our own bodies negated--especially if we are female. 

When the establishment forces us into a corner and make us feel powerlessness, is it really surprising our voting system has become compromised as well? A real life example of how far the establishment is willing to go to prevent progressive change on a local level is given, along with an update on the Recount 2016 from Jill Stein's campaign. The powers-that-be want to control and manipulate the popular vote.  Yes, the elite 1% fears we of the 99% that much. They might not cherish our minds and bodies, but they are very wary of our abilities to take action. And we are capable of action against them... Decisive action. Keep that thought in mind. When we value ourselves and our abilities, we have greater power than those who try to control us.
It's no time for tears. It's time to fight back. Knowledge is the first step. Read, discuss, comment and share this blog with others. They can't shut down our conversations off line quite as easily as they block them online, you know?

Our minds matter. The establishment wouldn't try to brainwash us so much into thinking otherwise if they didn't. Be true to yourself. Think for yourself. You might just like the world you help create. After all, it'll be a world made in our image, not theirs.


Trump's Latest Gambit: 
by Bern Notice

President Trump is at it again. If there is anything that should be crystal clear about his agenda, it is that he clearly does not like Obama-care (a.k.a. the Affordable Care Act). Despite his efforts to push the current Republican Congress to repeal it, he has come up short in every single attempt.

Now he is continuing his attempts to undermine it, likely in hopes to sway the public to put greater pressure on Congress to repeal it. The latest effort is less about popularity as it is about throwing red meat to the evangelical wing within the Republican party.
On Friday, the administration made one of its boldest moves yet, with two memos from multiple agencies that would dramatically curtail women’s access to birth control through their employers. The new regulations, effective immediately, would exempt all employers and insurers from covering or paying for coverage of contraceptives if they object “based on its sincerely held religious beliefs,” or have other “moral convictions” against covering such care.
Source: The Atlantic - Trump Reverses Obama Rule on Birth Control
Birth control is a method of preventing pregnancies which in turn prevent abortions. How is it productive to do away with birth control in health insurance?

Problem #1: Birth control isn't just for preventing pregnancies.

Contraceptives, specifically birth control pills, are not just a matter of birth control. They are also used to relieve pain that comes with heavy menstruation, lessens bleeding during periods, and help regulate them for women who need it. Doing away with contraceptives effectively leaves women who are using birth control for these means to suffer needlessly. This particularly falls under health care. Feel free to check into it yourself.
Source: WebMD.com - Other Uses for Birth Control

The ability to deny contraceptive/ birth control option in health insurance is also counter-productive to what evangelicals say they are worried about--abortions. If pregnancies are prevented from happening, there are fewer abortions. This is a good thing, particular for adults who either aren't interested in having, or are financially and emotionally ill equipped to have, children. According to a 2012 study by the Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis:
From 2008 to 2010, annual abortion rates among study participants ranged from 4.4 to 7.5 per 1,000 women. This is a substantial drop (ranging from 62 to 78 percent) compared to the national rate of 19.6 abortions per 1,000 women in 2008, the latest year for which figures are available. The lower abortion rates among Choice study participants also is considerably less than the rates in St. Louis city and county, which ranged from 13.4 to 17 per 1,000 women for the same years.
Among girls ages 15 to 19 who had access to free birth control provided in the study, the annual birth rate was 6.3 per 1,000, far below the U.S. rate of 34.3 per 1,000 for girls the same age.
Source: Washington University School of Medicine (2012) - Access to Free Birth Control Reduces Abortion Rates
Further, The Guardian reports:
The rate of abortion in the US reached a lower level in 2014 than in any other year since the procedure first became legal, a study has found, a decline that appears to be due to the widespread use of contraception producing a drop in unintended pregnancies.
Nineteen percent of pregnancies ended in abortion in 2014 – the lowest abortion rate since the supreme court handed down Roe v Wade in 1973, legalizing the procedure – and the number of abortions between 2011 and 2014 also fell, by 12%.
But the researchers found strong indications to link the decline in the abortion rate to the wider availability of highly effective contraception – which could be imperiled by efforts to repeal Obamacare by the incoming Republican administration.
Source: The Guardian - US abortion rate is lowest since Roe v Wade – but contraception access may go
Abortion Gutmacher
Image from: The Guttmacher Institute - U.S. Abortion Rate Continues to Decline, Hits Historic Low
Later it continues...
Some data – such as trends in contraception usage – that could help determine the reasons for the decline are not yet available for 2014. Still, the researchers predicted that the drop in the abortion rate had less to do with new restrictions than with changes in contraception usage and a reduction in unintended pregnancies. One clue is that more than 60% of the decline in the abortion rate took place in states that had not enacted new hurdles to getting the procedure.
If the drop is due to contraception, it would have alarming implications for Republicans’ breakneck campaign to repeal the ACA. The law says that most health insurance plans must cover a broad range of contraceptive drugs and devices at no copay – the so-called contraception mandate. Public health advocates have credited this provision with an explosion in women’s access to more affordable and more effective birth control.
Source: The Guardian - US abortion rate is lowest since Roe v Wade – but contraception access may go
So based on all of the above information, it is logical to conclude that the removal of the contraception mandate has a very good chance of increasing abortion. If you're an evangelical who supports this, how does this make sense? If you care so much about the aborting of fetuses, would it not be logical to prevent them in the first place? How does this end in a win for you?

Problem #2: Good Ol' Religious hypocrisy

Another problem with this decision starts with the decision to base contraceptive access in health care based on "religion." I could go into the establishment clause added to the First Amendment, but some will have a different point of view on it. The problem is that once you make an exception for one religious group in reference to secular law, you now lay the groundwork for other laws to be catered to other religious groups.

To demonstrate the point, let's change the religion and circumstance. Let's assume for a moment that we substitute evangelical Christians with Jehovah's Witnesses. Let's assume that you and your family work for and are covered by health insurance provided by a business owned by a Jehovah's Witness. You and your loved one are driving to a movie, then your car is hit at an intersection.
Religion 
You're ferried away to the hospital to tend to your wounds, and you've lost a lot of blood. The doctors state that you need a blood transfusion, but you can't get one because your insurance doesn't cover blood transfusions. Your employer opted out because they are against his firmly held religious belief. Does this still make sense to you?

The point here is that practice of your religion is fine. Declining coverage for yourself because of your beliefs are fine. When your beliefs are used as a means of depriving others of their rights, that's a problem. Your right to practice your personal faith ends where another persons life and beliefs begin. Otherwise, we are no longer a republic governed by the rule of law. We become a theocracy.

Part #3: What's in YOUR wallet?

The last issue that I will address (although there are a myriad of other problems) is the myth that this saves money for the tax payer. I must call "b.s." on that because while it saves money in the short term, it is vastly more expensive in the long term. If birth control isn't made available, particularly in low income areas, it ends in one of two ways:
  1. The mother has an abortion, to which we refer to part #2, or
  2. The mother gives birth to a child.
While it may sound hunky dory with the "individual responsibility" crowd, let's carry this forward to the logical conclusion. If the parents happen to find a way to climb out of poverty, that's great. Unfortunately, the odds are that they will not. So the parents have to raise a child, when they can barely support themselves. This leads to having to get tax payer funded support for the parents and child in the form of WIC, Food Stamps and other programs to keep them afloat.

If the parents can't cope, they turn their child over to foster care, which again will rely on tax dollars. If not, they may abuse or kill the child, which lands the parents in jail,  and if the child survives, the child is placed in foster care--both of which cost tax payer money.

If the parent can cope, then the child goes to school, most likely public school, since private school costs money that the parents likely don't have. Hopefully the child stays on the straight and narrow and the child becomes a productive adult. If not, and the child gets in trouble, you now have another resident of the prison system.
Conservative Logic Birth to Jail

So where does the savings come from by cutting birth control? Even in the most optimistic setting, a child born costs more money when compared to having birth control freely available to keep things as they were.

Summary:
What is the end game here? Based on available data, abortions will likely go up with the mandatory birth control mandate being repealed. So, it doesn't make sense logically from a evangelical point of view. It doesn't add up financially, because in the long run it costs more to not have the mandate that it would to simply keep it. If you have an ounce of integrity in your body, you know that this simply opens up Pandora's Box in terms of religious exemptions for secular laws. If you don't and have no problem with it, I don't want to hear you complain when someone from another faith calls for an exception to government policy.

At the end of the day, this is just chum for Trump's base. Nothing else logically adds up. Sooner or later, they need to understand that this extremely short term "win" will end up being a major loss in the long term. The fact is this really hurts more people than it helps.

BIO: Bern Notice fights for the hearts and minds of Americans through his progressive insights and arguments. Check out his blog here.






***

From Ohio Green Party organizer and former senate candidate Joe DeMare:


"Well, for me this is a nail in the coffin for the idea that Facebook can be used as a catalyst for social change. I've fought with countless trolls; they don't daunt me. But, I bought Facebook advertising for our Green Party candidate for Bowling Green city council-at-large, Beverly Ann Keeling Elwazani, and had a shocking experience. 

The ad was doing great for the first few days; almost a 1,000 views through advertising and with a high percentage of sharing, over 2,000 views altogether. Not bad for a municipality of only 30,000 people. Then, the numbers stopped going up. I couldn't understand it. 

Now I see that the numbers stopped increasing because Facebook simply stopped showing the ads. They left about 2/3 of the money I had budgeted unspent. In the meantime, they kept running ads for our Democratic Party opponents. I still see them every day. Facebook is not supposed to pick winners and losers in political campaigns. This sucks."

The establishment will do whatever it takes to remain in power--even blocking lowly Facebook ads. Don't forget to put on your "thinking caps" and question those in authority. Double-check their math. The following report from the Jill Stein campaign about Recount 2016 demonstrates this well. 

Jill 2016

In a country that proudly calls itself a democracy, the question we raised with the 2016 recount effort was simple: do we have an election system we can trust, that is accurate, secure and just?

So far, the answer is a resounding NO.

In an age of commonplace computer security breaches - from the WannaCry ransomware intrusions into energy, health care and transportation, to the Equifax hack into hundreds of millions of credit accounts - it's astounding that the security of our voting technology has still not been verified.

To put it simply, an un-recountable election is a blank check for fraud and malfeasance. It is a guarantee that elections cannot and will not be verified.

For that reason, we continue to fight in the court of law and the court of public opinion for a just and verifiable voting system we can trust!

At the Democracy Convention in August, a number of leaders from the recount effort reported on key findings, ongoing challenges and lessons learned from the recount effort so far.

Legal action continues in Pennsylvania, and we are still working with the Wisconsin Election Commission to get important information about voting machines in Wisconsin. Stay tuned for more information as it becomes available.


Recount 2016 overview:

Jill Stein and Alex Halderman, leading expert on election cybersecurity, gave a big picture overview of the 2016 recount effort. Dr. Halderman detailed the shocking vulnerability of our voting system to hacking and other forms of tampering. Dr. Stein discussed the politically-fueled opposition in the US to verifying the vote, a practice that is common in democratic countries around the world. All this underscores why we need election protection in the form of paper ballots, routine audits to verify the vote count, and cybersecurity best practices to prevent hacking of the vote.

Watch the Recount 2016 overview.
Recount reports from MI, PA and WI:

Lynne Serpe, George Martin and Rick Lass, who were on the front lines of the recount efforts in Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania, reported what happened in each state and ongoing election integrity struggles. In Michigan, political operatives leaned on partisan judges to stop the recount - but not before it exposed major problems calling the 2016 results into question. In Pennsylvania, a nightmare of bureaucracy stopped thousands of voters calling for a recount in a state that relies heavily on touch-screen voting machines banned in other states. In Wisconsin, we saw “half a recount” that glossed over the major communities of color that are most vulnerable to voter suppression.

Watch the Recount Reports from MI, PA and WI.
Recounts and lessons learned, 2004-2016:

Election integrity veterans Lynne Serpe, Mark Halvorson and John Maa discuss the recent history of recounts in the US, from the 2004 Ohio recount to the 2016 recount effort, and what we’ve learned about how to create a voting system we can trust.

Watch Recounts and Lessons Learned, 2004-2016.
It’s clear that the struggle for election integrity and voting justice won’t be easy or quick, but it is critical for building a real democracy. Thank you for leading the charge in this critical struggle.

It’s in our hands,
Jill Stein

PS. If you have questions about the recount effort or ongoing election integrity litigation, please take a look at our Recount 2016 frequently asked questions. If you don’t see an answer to your question, please send it to us and we’ll do our best to answer it. 

***
314 Action
Another terrible nomination from the White House.

Trump's pick to be his senior adviser on environmental policy -- Kathleen Hartnett White -- once described climate change as a "kind of paganism for secular elites." She has also denied that carbon dioxide is a pollutant, calling it “the gas of life on this planet”. 

The good news? Her appointment requires Senate confirmation. That means we can fight this if we speak up now and speak up LOUDLY. 

Add your name to demand your senators vote NO on this dangerous nomination >>

Kathleen Hartnett White isn’t the only one of Trump’s nominees with some controversial -- and downright dangerous -- opinions on science. 

There’s Sam Clovis, Trump’s pick for the top science position at USDA -- a rampant climate change denier who helped push racist “birther” conspiracy theories about President Obama.

His pick to head up NASA, Jim Bridenstine, thinks we should study climate change on the moon instead of on earth -- because he doesn’t believe it’s caused by humans.

And then there’s Michael Dourson, who has already started advising Scott Pruitt at the EPA despite having not yet been confirmed by the Senate over controversial ties to the chemical industry. 

Blocking these nominees is critical. It’s the difference between leadership and denial, between protection and destruction. We need to act now. 

Sign our petition to the Senate to demand they reject Trump’s climate denying nominees!
 
Thanks for signing on.
- Team 314 Action

***

Congress is rushing a bill that would give Donald Trump and the NSA the power to spy on Americans – without even getting a warrant.
Donald Trump is a known bully who will use every power available to him to threaten everyone, from decorated war veterans to journalists to ordinary people who oppose his agenda.
So it’s terrifying to think about Trump having far-reaching spying powers.
The House of Representatives just introduced a bill to extend Trump’s power to snoop on Americans’ phone calls and emails for 6 years – without needed reforms to prevent abuse.
Right now, loopholes in a legal authority known as Section 702 give Trump and the NSA the power to spy on Americans without a warrant.The House recently introduced a bill called the USA Liberty Act to extend Section 702. And it lacks needed reforms to prevent abuse of this far-reaching surveillance power.
That’s why we’re joining with 17 progressive organizations to call on Congress to fundamentally fix the USA Liberty Act, and push for reforms like those mentioned in Senators Ron Wyden and Rand Paul's bill, the USA RIGHTS Act. Only then can we make sure that Section 702 doesn't allow the government to spy on Americans on without a warrant.
Congress has between now and the end of the year to reauthorize Section 702. While the Trump administration wants a straight reauthorization, a growing bipartisan block of Congress want reforms. But it’s up to us to make sure Congress passes real reforms that will actually prevent warrantless spying on Americans.
Here’s why the USA Liberty Act needs to be fundamentally fixed. It currently:
  • It doesn’t stop backdoor searches, which is when the government searches through the hundreds of millions of communications it collects yearly for information on Americans and people on U.S. soil – all without a warrant. Instead, the bill okays accessing and sharing this information for foreign intelligence purposes, a loophole big enough to drive a truck through.
  • It fails to permanently end "about" collection, an illegal practice the NSA says they've stopped that allows for warrantless spying on Americans’ communications that merely mention an intelligence target. Collections should be limited to communications that are "to" or "from" a target.
  • It doesn’t prevent the government from secretly using surveillance information in court against defendants. Despite tens of thousands of searches by the government of Section 702 data, only a handful of defendants have ever received notice of it – and only after the Department of Justice was caught misleading the Supreme Court about its practices.
Meanwhile Senators Wyden and Paul's USA RIGHTS Act addresses each of these problems by closing loopholes and placing limits on the NSA.
We’re teaming up with 17 progressive organizations to call on the House to fundamentally fix the USA Liberty Act, and support the reform measures in the Senate's USA RIGHTS Act. Now it’s time your representatives in Congress heard from you.
Thanks for taking action,

Reuben and the team at Demand Progress