It's been a tough year, but it's also been a productive one for many progressive groups. The second annual "Unity March" in Toledo, Ohio, organized by the YWCA was a success. Even with dense fog earlier in the day and a misty rain all afternoon, there was a good turnout. The march began at the "Toledo Loves Love" wall and continued down Adams Street to historic Trinity Episcopal Church.
by C.A. Matthews
Is it possible for the Left to unite and defeat the powers of corporatism, a.k.a. fascism?
It's a question that haunts many progressives, and I'm no exception. For every successful "unity event" I've witnessed, I've also experienced a catty remark from someone whose opinion boils down to "It's my way or the highway." In other words, not everyone wants to build a future to believe in if it's not done in a manner they feel is best. They'd rather we all suffer together if they can't see their vision come to pass with their chosen candidate or through their particular plan of action. Selfish but true.
For instance, the drive to reform the Democratic Party from within. Groups such as Our Revolution and Justice Democrats have done their best to whip up support and increase progressive membership in the party. However, the same corporate-owned politicos remain entrenched in the highest positions, and they don't act like they're open to progressive newcomers in their ranks. The more things change, the more things seem to stay the same in the DNC.
Still, you can't fault people for trying. It's better to say you tried and failed than you never gave the Dems a chance to reform themselves. But is it worth it to continue spending time, energy and resources to change a party that doesn't want to change? Can the Left unite around a party that wants to remain on good terms with their corporate paymasters? Wouldn't it be better to unite around the progressive ideals that Bernie Sanders and the Greens have espoused and wave good-bye to the DNC? Wouldn't it possibly be better to start a whole new party, a people's party?
For every progressive you meet, you'll get a different answer to these questions. So, we might as well agree to disagree on how we view the effectiveness of trying to reform an establishment party. Once we acknowledge that we hold slightly different takes on what it means to be a progressive, then we can build a coalition to work on the major building blocks of that future we all believe in--universal health care, free education from daycare through college, environmental protections, the development of clean energy sources, taking big money out of politics, among others.
If everyone on the Left side of the political spectrum focuses on tackling these issues one by one, and puts all posturing aside, then we will be strong enough to create a united front against the fascists. We will have the power to put them out of business once and for all.
For every progressive you meet, you'll get a different answer to these questions. So, we might as well agree to disagree on how we view the effectiveness of trying to reform an establishment party. Once we acknowledge that we hold slightly different takes on what it means to be a progressive, then we can build a coalition to work on the major building blocks of that future we all believe in--universal health care, free education from daycare through college, environmental protections, the development of clean energy sources, taking big money out of politics, among others.
If everyone on the Left side of the political spectrum focuses on tackling these issues one by one, and puts all posturing aside, then we will be strong enough to create a united front against the fascists. We will have the power to put them out of business once and for all.
It is possible to unite the Left. Anyone who fights against that unity is on the other side. Don't listen to them. Unite anyway. We have important work to do.
Look what happens when we work together...
From the Hightower LowDown--Ordinary People Working Together to Win Elections:
https://hightowerlowdown.org/article/ordinary-winning/
Beanstock's World takes a look at the advantages of voting on paper ballots and how it could strengthen democracy:
https://beanstocksworld.wordpress.com/2018/01/22/paper-vs-online-voting/
Why we need to work together, now more than ever:
Inequality Is Killing America's Children
https://ourfuture.org/20180122/death-by-inequality-poverty-and-racism-are-killing-americas-children?utm_source=progressive_breakfast&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=pbreak
Beanstock's World takes a look at the advantages of voting on paper ballots and how it could strengthen democracy:
https://beanstocksworld.wordpress.com/2018/01/22/paper-vs-online-voting/
Why we need to work together, now more than ever:
Inequality Is Killing America's Children
https://ourfuture.org/20180122/death-by-inequality-poverty-and-racism-are-killing-americas-children?utm_source=progressive_breakfast&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=pbreak
***
Democracy is under attack in Ohio! Read on to learn more:
Democracy is under attack in Ohio! Read on to learn more:
House JointResolution 5 (HJR 5),
introduced in fall 2017 in both houses of the Ohio General Assembly,
would dramatically change the already-difficult process to amend the
Ohio Constitution and is stealthily making its way through the Ohio
General Assembly.
Make
no mistake, this is a direct attempt to thwart direct democracy by the
people of Ohio. It is an attempt to make sure that only the state
legislature has the power and ability to pass laws that WE must follow.
It is an effort to make sure the people cannot propose legislation that
the general assembly refuses to pass OR repeal legislation that the
people find unjust or oppressive. Remember the people repealed SB5 in 2011.
This
is a direct attack on the constitutional check and balance that the
people of Ohio have over the state legislature. Here are the highlights
(or lowlights) of this proposal:
· Raise from 10% to 12.5%
the number of petition signatures of Ohio’s registered voters (in the
last gubernatorial election) to put a proposed constitutional amendment
on the ballot. Based on turnout for the 2014 election for governor,
about 318,000 valid signatures
presently are needed to put an issue on the ballot, but the 12.5%
requirement would raise the total by 79,000 additional signatures, to
about 394,000 valid signatures.
· Raise from a simple majority (50% + 1 vote) to 60%
the total number of votes required to pass an amendment to the Ohio
Constitution, or to pass a law proposed by the people. In 2017, about
1,600,000 people voted on the victim’s rights constitutional amendment,
and 50% + 1 votes, roughly 800,000, would suffice to pass it. The
proposed 60% super-majority requirement would make it necessary for
150,000 to 170,000 additional votes to pass a constitutional amendment
or a new statute proposed by the people. Instead of about 800,000 votes,
nearly 1,000,000 votes would be required. Funny how this 60% rule doesn’t apply to candidate elections to office.
· Raise from 3% to 3.75%
the number of registered voters’ signatures to propose legislation to
the Ohio General Assembly, an increase of about 24,000 signatures.
Currently about 94,000 valid signatures are needed. The proposed change
would increase the requirement to about 118,000. The proposed
legislation would require, first, obtaining an additional 3.75%, instead
of the current 3%, of registered voter signatures, followed by a vote by a 60% super-majority.
· Prohibit payment of any compensation to a petition circulator for gathering signatures.
About the sponsor of this resolution:
State Representative Niraj
Antani (R-Miamisburg) released the following statement regarding
the announcement of the potential initiative constitutional amendment
for the adult consumption of recreational marijuana:
"The
initiative constitutional amendment proposed today is yet
another ill-conceived ballot initiative with dishonest intentions,
amplifying the need to pass House Joint Resolution 5, which I introduced
recently. This is another proposal attempting to use the Ohio
Constitution as a means for a special interest to make a profit at the
expense of the taxpayers of Ohio, a gross misuse of our democratic
process. HJR 5 would preserve the integrity of our state’s founding
document and prevent moneyed special interest groups from buying our
ballot. Today’s proposal is exactly what I am trying to stop with HJR 5.
We must pass HJR 5 to stop this additional attempt for a moneyed
special interest to hijack our ballot and buy their way into the Ohio
Constitution.”
This misleading statement is appalling for many reasons—
· Representative
Antani wants to make it more difficult for the people to have a check
on a state legislature that is bought and paid for by corporate special
interests, while he presents the amendment as being in the best
interests of the people.
· Representative
Antani has received campaign money from First Energy, Dayton Power and
Light, Nisource, the Automobile Dealers Association and other corporate
interests. He, like most of our elected officials, are beholden to and
represent the interests of corporations over the interests of the people
of Ohio.
· If
Representative Antani was serious about special interests hijacking our
ballots and buying our Constitution, then he would be sponsoring
legislation limiting corporate lobbyist donations to issues and
candidates. He would be proposing a Fair Elections constitutional
amendment along the lines of what Youngstown tried to get on their local
ballot, until the state blocked it. http://www.protectyoungstown.org/fair-elections.html
· If
this is so important to protect the people, why, without any public
debate, is this being proposed for the May 8 ballot in Ohio?
· If
this proposal gets on the ballot, it will only need 50% + 1 to become a
law that will limit and stifle democracy forever after to a “super
majority” of 60%.
We
the people of Ohio cannot continue to allow a corrupt state legislature
to slowly take away the people’s voice in governing decisions. Our
democratic rights are being sabotaged, and we the people must say NO and
say it loudly. We must support initiatives and organizations that are
attempting to reverse this corporate state agenda and put democracy back
in the hands of the people who will be affected by the laws that are
passed. We must recognize that we the people are following laws written
by and for corporations, and work to reverse this so that we the people are writing laws that corporations must follow.
The
OHCRN is proposing two constitutional amendments to do just that. The
Ohio Community Rights Amendment and the Initiative and Referendum for
Counties and Township Amendment. Visit our website at http://ohcommunityrights.org/projects/statewide-constitutional-change/ to read both proposals full text and contact us to find out how you can help.
Join us in the effort to “legalize” and protect democracy by the people in Ohio.
Tish O'Dell
Tree Media presents We the People 2.0 – The Second American Revolution, a film featuring the new democracy movement building across the United States.
Support OHCRN. Make your contribution today. Thank you!
***
Donald Trump has made a political career out of demonizing people like me.
He announced his presidential campaign by calling Mexicans rapists, criminals and drug dealers. Just last week, he called Haiti and nations in Africa “shithole countries,” saying we should accept more immigrants from Norway instead.
Beyond these racist words, Trump and his administration are rapidly advancing hateful policies. The day before his “shithole countries” comment, ICE raided more than a hundred 7-Eleven stories across the country.
Faced with Donald Trump and the Republican Party’s relentless attacks on immigrants of color, it may be tempting to give up. To let their words define me and my family.
But I choose hope. I’m in this fight because, like my mother, I have hope that the power of the people will change our country.
My name is America Reyes. I’m a Mexican immigrant who migrated to the US when I was 5 years old. I’m a leader with the Progressive Leadership Alliance of Nevada, a People’s Action member organization.
My parents brought me here with a dream. They wanted a better life for me. Just like them, I work every day to fulfill my dreams and thrive without fear of deportation again. I’ve been an active community member advocating for immigrant communities. I hope to become a lawyer and a judge one day. I want to have the power to carry justice forward and to continue the legacy of generations before me.
I also want to set an example for my younger sisters — I want them to know that we can win when we fight for our dignity. And I fight for a clean Dream Act to honor the fights my parents have gone through to be able to dream.
Every day, about 122 young people like me lose their Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) status. That means there are over a hundred youth each day at risk of being torn from their families and the country they call home.
This is a moment of crisis for my family, as it is for so many families across the nation.
I fear for how my younger sisters will feel being torn apart from their big sister. I worry for how my parents will fare having their daughter stolen from them.
I am young woman with rights and dreams. And I deserve to see them through.
Congress is negotiating the fate of 700,000 Dreamers this week. You can call 888-778-6856 and be directly connected to your member of Congress.
The stakes couldn’t be higher. Please join me in making the dreams of hundreds of thousands of young immigrants come true. Call Congress today and demand they pass a clean DREAM Act.
Onward,
.jpg)
America Reyes Leader Progressive Leadership Alliance of Nevada and People’s Action
***
From Credo:There is a massive new threat to fragile bee populations, and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has the power to stop it.
Syngenta, the Swiss-based agro-chemical rival to Monsanto, is seeking government approval to spray its bee-killing pesticide thiamethoxam on more than 165 million acres of American crop land.1
If the Scott Pruitt-led EPA under Donald Trump’s regime approves the company's application to apply massive amounts of this toxic pesticide on popular crops like wheat, barley, rice, alfalfa and potato, we could see even more dramatic and rapid declines of bee colonies. We must urge the EPA to deny Syngenta's application immediately.
Tell the EPA: No mass spraying of toxic, bee-killing pesticides. Click here to sign the petition.
In recent years, bee populations have plummeted significantly due in large part to the expanded use of bee-killing pesticides. More than 700 North American bee species are at risk for extinction, and in 2016-2017 alone, beekeepers lost 33 percent of their bees, yet the EPA has failed to take significant steps to limit pesticide use.2,3 In fact, just before Donald Trump took office, the EPA publicly acknowledged that neonic pesticides pose a significant risk to honeybees but backed away from a proposed rule to limit their use.4
Incredibly, this proposal by Syngenta to significantly ramp up its use of this toxic chemical on crop land fell on the very same day the EPA released a stunning new report detailing the dangers neonicotinoids such as thiamethoxam pose to animal life, including birds of all sizes.5 This most recent EPA study comes on the heels of numerous studies detailing the risks neonics also pose to invertebrate aquatic life.
As Lori Ann Burd, director of the Center for Biological Diversity's environmental health program, put it:
"If the EPA grants Syngenta's wish, it will spur catastrophic declines of aquatic invertebrates and pollinator populations that are already in serious trouble."6Activism to protect bee populations works. Hundreds of thousands of CREDO members have mobilized in recent years to pressure the EPA to restrict expansion of Monsanto's bee-killing neonicotinoid pesticides. But with Trump occupying the White House and Pruitt leading the EPA, we need to double down our efforts to keep these toxic pesticides from dramatically worsening the bee crisis.
Tell the EPA: No mass spraying of toxic, bee-killing pesticides. Click the link below to sign the petition:
https://act.credoaction.com/
Thanks for all you do.
Josh Nelson, Deputy Political Director CREDO Action from Working Assets
Add your name:
|
- Grace Guarnieri, "EPA Might Let Bee-Killing Pesticide Be Sprayed On 165M Acres of Farmland," Newsweek, Dec. 21, 2017.
- Justin Worland, "More than 700 North American Bee Species Are Headed Toward Extinction," TIME, March 2, 2017.
- University of Maryland, "American beekeepers lost 33 percent of bees in 2016-17," May 25, 2017.
- Center for Biological Diversity, "Same Day: EPA Acknowledges Proven Dangers of Bee-killing Pesticides But Refuses to Restrict Them," Jan. 12, 2017.
- Center for Biological Diversity, "EPA Considers Allowing Bee-Killing Pesticide to Be Sprayed on 165 Million Acres of U.S. Farmland," Dec. 19. 2017.
- Ibid.
***
From Social Security Works:As all eyes are focused on a potential government shutdown, the Senate is attempting to sneak through Alex Azar. He’s Donald Trump’s new pick for Secretary of Health and Human Services, the cabinet post that oversees Medicare and Medicaid. And he might be even worse than Trump’s first HHS Secretary, Tom Price.
Alex Azar is the definition of the “revolving door” in Washington. He used his time serving in George W. Bush’s Department of Health and Human Services to cater to big pharma’s whims, auditioning for a cushy corporate job. He then spent nearly a decade personally profiting off of an industry he once regulated. And now he wants back in at HHS.
At a time of skyrocketing drug prices, we need a health secretary who will take on the drug companies, not pad their pockets!
Thank you for taking action today.
Michael Phelan
Social Security Works
Christopher
Herrera